A shared lament among real estate agents is that there is a glut of inventory and a shortage of buyers. Add the issue of sellers stubbornly holding to high asking prices, and it's a recipe for a molasses slow market.
But I'm sure sure it's quite so simple. My two colleagues and I at CBA are actually having more of a problem with an inventory shortage of houses that our clients want to buy. Some may have even seen the house they like, but want to do more shopping and see more houses before making a decision. Often, we don't have a lot of other choices to fill out the dance card. Without a larger menu to pick from, they're hesitant to make a decision.
Between the 3 of us, we have a half dozen clients who fall into this category. They've seen a house they reasonably like. When asked the question, "What is it about the house that would keep you from buying it?", the surprising response is "Nothing major, really. We'd just like to see more." We're not hearing the major common objections from these folks — price, location, setting, condition, etc.
The common element among these buyers? They're all looking in categories where we may only have a couple of houses — or at least houses that we feel are good examples of what they're looking for — to show. Property categories currently with a dearth of choices include farmhouses or charmers on quiet country roads under $300,000, contemporaries with views under $450,000, moderately priced 3+ bedroom lakefront homes, "cabins in the woods" in the mid to upper $100's, and the once plentiful "vacation chalet" with cathedral ceilings and a loft set in the woods.
Consider the situation with those under $300,000 charmers. Last spring and summer, we had a reasonably good selection. There were 5 or 6 good choices that I could string together for a showing day that presented a well rounded selection. Most of those are gone, and haven't been replaced by comparable houses coming to market. Even just above the $300,000 cutoff, there haven't been charmers coming to market that will just need some time to "age" and the sellers to get religion about price. The next price jump for charmers is to the upper $300's to low $400's, for a handful of larger, grander houses.
It's a very strange situation to say to a potential buyer, "Here are the one or two (farmhouses or houses on motorboat lakes or view houses whatever) on the market in your price range that fit your criteria." Folks don't want to schlep up from the city to see just one or two houses, so we end up padding out trips with houses that, frankly, don't fit their criteria.
Recently, the most common "end of trip" conversation with prospective buyers goes something like this. Buyers - "We liked the third house you showed us a lot. So we'd like to come back in two weeks to see some more houses like it. If you can put together 5 or 6, that would be great." Me - "I don't have 5 or 6 more houses like this to show you. In fact, today you've seen everything that comes even reasonably close to what you're looking for." Buyers - "Well, then can you keep us in mind and send along anything like this that does come on the market. And when there are few to take a look at, we'll come back up."
So that third house they liked? They would probably buy it, if I showed it alongside 5 or 6 reasonably "close but no cigar" options, so they felt they were making the best choice among a selection of good options. But that psychology doesn't hold when it's one good choice among 5 lousy options.
I've blogged a couple of times about the factors that make a house "deal capable", where the seller is ready to be realistic. For example, a house being on the market for more than one year. Likewise, there are some factors that contribute to buyers being "decision capable." On the buyer side, it is probably less related to "time spent looking" and more related to "selection of reasonably good choices seen." It's not specifically the total number of houses seen, but rather that they've seen enough houses to have a short list of 3 or 4 that they'd seriously consider buying. Without a shortlist of 3 or 4 choices, they may just not make a decision. With shortages in some categories, it may be impossible to come up with a 3 or 4 house shortlist.