My Photo

David Knudsen

Become a Fan

Search This Blog

  • Google

    WWW
    blog.catskill4sale.com

Catskills Buyer Agency

  • Judith Haas-Siegel
    Licensed Broker
    3 California Ave.
    Liberty, NY 12754
    845-295-9500

« Not Enough Houses | Main | Site Overhaul »

February 06, 2010

Comments

Re mark to market (and at the risk of duplicating what's already been said): I assume that Nick is not a regulated financial institution or a publicly traded company. If so, if he were asking investors to put their money in Nick Inc., then yes, he would have to mark to market. But as a private citizen there is just no point to constantly monitor the value of our summer houses. Doing so is *extremely* counterproductive and can result in poor decision making.

If indeed one obsesses over being "under water" (which may indeed be the case for me, as I bought in 08 at what was then a reasonable price), one may be tempted to do something dumb, such as walk away from the property when one can afford to make the payments.

I think what some of the people posting here are missing is that buying a house to occupy and buying a house/land as an investment involve totally different decision making processes.

If you buy a house for investment purposes your sole interest is in turning it over, the quicker the better, at a profit. Often the best values are obtained by buying schlocky houses with crack dens in the basements in bad parts of Liberty, Fallsburg or Monticello.

But buying a house to occupy seasonally is a totally different thing. It is an emotional decision. One doesn't want to be ripped off, but there is no reliable way of predicting any market. If the market goes in your favor, fine. If not, well that's just too bad. It's still the house you wanted.

Now what you *don't* want in the latter scenario is a gas well popping up next door. That, I admit, could turn a dream house into a nightmare. But a falling market just isn't something a home buyer or seller can factor into the equation.

In much the same way that real estate in SC hit a frenzy a several years back, there is a similar hysteria in the opposite direction which can be seen by posters like ar and pa.

With US population expected to grow by 140 million in the next 40 years, land will continually become more valuable. Where are these 140 million people going? Do you think they're going to pile up further in cities? not likely.

As technology improves and telecommuting further changes the workplace, combined with population growing out of control, land and privacy will become more valuable. Urban sprawl will widen its reach and suburbs will become overcrowded. It may not be next month, but the market will rebound in the other direction and those sitting on land in the country will be glad they decided to make the move when they did.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.